Back Home Up Next

Mar 2004 Abstract

Unocal's 4-C Experience: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

by Mike Reblin -  Ensoco
 

horizontal rule

Abstract

Unocal, through its Corporate Technology Plan, had a program, during 1998 and 1999, to develop multi-component technology in the following areas:

1.Attaka  4C-3D              Imaging through a gas cloud.
2.Gulf of Thailand 4C-2D  Imaging in low P wave reflectivity zones.
3.McArthur River 4C-2D    Imaging through a gas cloud.
4.Reinecke 4D-3C           Land Time-lapse monitoring of a CO2 flood.
5.Silangkitang 3C-2D       Land Imaging of faults and fractures in a geothermal area.

The Attaka 4C-3D pilot survey was acquired over the Attaka Oil Field to test the application of multi-component technology to solve a gas cloud problem.  Discovered in 1971, the development of the Attaka field has been plagued by the gas cloud that covers the core field area.  The loss of a platform by a gas blowout in 1997 prompted the BU to acquire a pilot 4C-3D survey around the area of the planned replacement platform.  A 3D VSP was simultaneously acquired in a well within the full-fold coverage area using the 4C shots as sources.  At this point the results looked encouraging.  However, an in-depth look at smaller but significant faults located within the 4C imaged area show they are not imaged well.  The PS data set is significantly better than the PP data and the original marine streamer data but, at this time, it falls short of meeting our geophysical needs.  Therefore, using the technique is not commercially viable at this time.

The Thai 4C-2D survey was obtained to increase the seismic bandwidth to image thin reservoir sands, 10 to 25 ft. thick.  Conventional marine streamer seismic did not provide this resolution.  Additionally, the business unit expanded their plan to include shear wave recording to address the problem of low P-wave impedance contrasts between the sands and shales.  A four line 2D program was acquired to test different imaging problems that existed in the area.  Line 1 in the Dara area was shot to study a gas cloud problem.  Line 2 over Erawan looked at low impedance P-wave contrasts in the gray bed reservoir.  Lines 3 and 4 were shot at the location of the proposed Trat platform to test finer resolution of the of thin sand beds in red bed section.  A 3C-VSP was acquired to calibrate the Trat lines.  The PZ data is better or at least equal to the marine streamer data.  The PS data provide better imaging in both the red and gray bed sections.  However, the technique is not commercially viable because (1) there is a high drilling success rate, (2) very low cost drilling and (3) a short life cycle of the producing wells.  If and when any of these factors change, 4C acquisition may become the geophysical tool of choice.

The most challenging survey Unocal attempted was in the McArthur Field located in the Cook Inlet, Alaska (Fig. 12).  The goal was to image through a gas chimney that created a large time sag in the streamer data in addition to degrading the image quality.  A major logistical issue was dealing with the large tidal currents as great as 6 knots with 10 m tides that limited shoot to times of slack tide.  It obviously was a logistical challenge to hold our cable in place between slack tides as it took 3 to 4 slack tides to layout, shoot and pickup the cable.  Prior to the survey, a dual offset VSP was acquired in a deviated well bore.  The near offset survey had both upgoing and downgoing travel paths within the gas chimney.  The far offset VSP was designed to keep the downgoing travel paths mostly outside the gas cloud.  The plan was to use these two VSPs to help calibrate the 4C processing of the OBC dataset.  Processing of both the VSP and OBC data turned out to be challenging.  For the OBC data, a strongly sloping water bottom, very noisy data and large statics were obstacles that had to be overcome.  At best, the dominant frequency of the PS data is 30 hz in PP time.  The PP data has much better frequency content than the PS data set.  Why?  That question puzzles us to this day.  Coupling of the horizontal phones is the primary suspect as we are left with quite a lot of energy on the transverse phones even after rotation to the inline and crossline components.  At this time, the needs of the business unit were not meet.  Data quality would have to be improved to the level of the marine streamer data outside of the gas cloud to impact our current drilling program.

Conclusions

Four component (4C) techniques have the promise to produce interpretable images in areas that have historically been difficult.  Further work is ongoing to reduce acquisition and processing costs, decrease processing turnaround time, and improve image quality.  As these data sets demonstrate, we still have a long ways to go to fully understand and leverage this tool to benefit the needs of our clients.  Advancements in resolving near surface statics, extremely low velocity shallow sediments and developing tools to integrate PZ and PS data will be required to bring this tool to the business units as a commercially viable tool.  Even with the results that have been shown, we are convinced that this tool will be a significant part of our geophysical toolkit in the not too distant future.

Biography

Mike graduated from the University of Utah with a Masters in Geophysics in 1973.  He worked for Gulf Oil for a year before joining Unocal where he worked for 26 years.  Mike held both managerial and technical positions during both international and domestic assignments.  For the last 8 years with Unocal, he was the seismic acquisition coordinator for worldwide operations working both land and marine operations in the Caspian, North and South America and the Far East.  His last work with Unocal was involved with marine multi-component (4C) surveys and applying 3D marine seismic to help plan offshore pipelines and offshore facilities.  Since May 2000, Mike has been a seismic acquisition consultant working on project management assignments

 

Debra Oudean, Unocal
Copyright © 2002 [Geophysical Society of Alaska]. All rights reserved.
Revised: October 27, 2006